City

Do-Nothing Scenario building

Pilot Implementation

SPROUT Tools

SUMP Recommendations

Scenario

Passenger

Freight

Pilot

Use case

Mobility solution

Problems

Alternative policy responses

Lessons learned

Innovation Readiness

Liveability

Type of city

Action tracker

1st layer cities

Padua

Scenario 1

In Padua's 1st scenario, a clear trend towards the use of environmentally friendly transport modes by the citizens is indicated. Regarding passenger transportation, the city expects an increase in the share of public transportation and micro-mobility as well as in the number of new mobility services that operate in the city. The increase in the population’s environmental consciousness, mentioned in this narrative scenario, is also further justified by the decrease on the share of car transportation up to 25% and the increase of the car sharing. The majority of the respondents indicated an increase of up to 10% in the share of micro-mobility means and car-sharing transportation and a tendency towards an increase of up to 15% of the public transportation share while the level of decrease in the car transportation share can reach up to 15%.

In terms of urban freight transportation, there is a trend towards an urban freight mix with 10% more green deliveries on the one hand and from 10 to 50% more next day/ next hour deliveries on the other hand.

Self-driving pods for cargo-hitching

• UC1: Self-driving pods for cargo hitching

Lane with self-driving pods for passengers and freight

• The different regulatory frameworks between passengers’ transport and freight and the different stakeholders’ needs • Lack of regulatory aspects about autonomous driving and interferences between pods and other vehicles • Fundraising for initial investment costs and administrative process • Lack of know-how in the field of administrative procedures for the assignment of non- conventional services, such as testing an experimental vehicle.

• PM1: Integration of NEXT with Local Public Transport and development of modal shift • PM2: Development of innovative solutions as support for logistics operators • PM3: New function/office dedicated to the development and management of freight logistics and Local Public Transport • PM4: Set-up of specific procurement procedures for innovative mobility solution

• Need to ensure a strong political commitment and coordination with the major stakeholders • Need to identify the relevant stakeholders adequately and involve them with an active role • The implementation of the transport model requires solid skills and know-how in logistics matters.

• IR Score: 3.43 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.56 • Climate and City Typology: 4.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 4.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.91 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.82 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 3.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 4.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 4.50 • Data availability: 3.00 • Cities Capacity: 2.80 • Culture: 2.70 • Industry Diversity: 3.00

• Liveability Score: 3.13 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 2.50 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.63 • Safe & Secure: 5.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 2.50 • Accessibility: 2.67 • Affordability: 3.67 • Availability: 1.00 • Safety and Security: 5.00 • Efficiency: 3.00 • Convenience: 3.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Mobility Pioneer

• Governance: 2.13 • Sustainability: 1.33 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.3 • Safety: 1.33 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.83 • Urban Space Allocation: 0.8

• The city should have a team of experts and access to specialized organizations and tools for guiding decision-making on mobility solutions to be adopted, assessing the solutions' impact and developing dedicated policies to strengthen innovation. • A dedicated department or authority (quick team) should be responsible for coordinating the actors in the speedy adoption and assessment of innovative solutions. The public administration personnel involved in mobility managing should have also knowledge about urbna logistics issues. • Need for full public involvement for SUMP and SULP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Citizens' engagement platforms should be created, together with 6-month meetings among industry partners and public administration for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city.

Scenario 2

In the city's 2nd scenario, the limited rise in environmental consciousness is clearly presented, with the majority of the respondents foreseeing a slight increase in the share of car transportation and no significant change in the share of car sharing transport. The share of public transportation, micro-mobility means (taking into consideration the mean value) as well as active transportation is expected to remain stable. More specifically, regarding the introduction of more new mobility services, the opinions are controversial, with the balance to be found among the scale’s value: “not affected” and increase of up to 5%.

In terms of the level of impact on green deliveries the median value from all the different opinions lies in the slight (<10%) increase. The only clear outcome is related to the share of next hour and next day deliveries. The majority of the respondents expect an increase in this indicator which might range from 10 to 30%.

Scenario 3

In the city's 3rd scenario, the stakeholders’ expectations show a clear trend towards the use of environmental friendly transport modes by the citizens. Regarding passenger transportation, the city expects an increase in the share of active transportation, public transportation and micro-mobility up to 10% as well as in the number of new mobility services that will operate in the city. The increase in the population’s environmental consciousness, mentioned in this narrative scenario, is also enhanced by the decrease in the share of car transportation lower than 5%. The beliefs regarding the potential change towards car-sharing services are divided in half, among those that forecast an increase in the share of car sharing and those that do not expect that this indicator will be affected. With respect to active transportation, the opinions are divided among two close ranges: lower than 5% and from 5 to 10%.

In terms of urban freight transportation, the answers show also a trend towards more green deliveries, with half of the respondents to foresee an up to 10% increase in the correspondent share of green deliveries. On the other hand though, a slight increase, up to 10%, on the next hour next day deliveries is also expected.

Valencia

Scenario 1

In the 1st scenario of Valencia, regarding passenger transportation, the city expects an increase of up to 10% in the use of Public Transportation, Micro-mobility and the share of active mobility (e.g. walking). Additionally, there is a slight decrease -of up to 5%- in the share of private car use, expressing an increase in the population’s environmental consciousness.

In terms of urban freight transportation, a full consensus has been reached and the figures show also a clear trend towards more green deliveries, with an increase of up to 30% in the share of green deliveries to be expected. On the other hand though, the same increase in the next-hour to same-day deliveries is also expected.

Intermodal urban Passenger/ freight node for collective public & private transport

• UC1: Parking for private bicycles into intermodal nodes • UC2: Smart lockers into intermodal nodes

Ciclopark (2 metro stations in Valencia, 1 in Alicante)

• Delays and poor data collection due to covid-19 (limited mobility and social distance were obstacles in the face-to-face survey) • Fewer potential users, due to reduced journeys (teleworking, restrictions on leisure activities, etc)

• PM1: Establishment of low emission zones • PM2: Building protected and well- maintained bike lanes • PM3: Improvement of existing bike network by connecting with interurban bike lanes as well as with urban intermodal modes • PM4: Sustainable public transport: subsidies and promotional campaigns

• Need for cooperation between different public bodies • Need for concurrence and action in a coordinated manner between public authorities and companies with different competencies • Need for incentives for the use of sustainable mobility solutions: costs for infrastructure, maintenance, tickets, etc covered by the public transport operator otherwise the it would be unfeasible if the users had to pay for the service • Need for awareness and dissemination campaigns among citizens – make it widely known – raise awareness of citizens toward the environment – gain the confidence of the users

• IR Score: 3.01 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.27 • Climate and City Typology: 4.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.94 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.46 • Inter-departmental coordination: 2.00 • Mobility Planning: 3.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 4.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 3.00 • Data availability: 1.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.30 • Culture: 3.00 • Industry Diversity: 4.00

• Liveability Score: 3.07 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 3.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.89 • Safe & Secure: 3.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.71 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.00 • Sustainability: 3.00 • Accessibility: 3.00 • Affordability: 3.33 • Availability: 2.33 • Safety and Security: 3.00 • Efficiency: 3.00 • Convenience: 2.60 • Behaviour and Smartness: 4.00

Sustainable

• Governance: 2.13 • Sustainability: 1.67 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.5 • Safety: 0.5 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.39 • Urban Space Allocation: 1.6

• Speed up the contractual process between the logistics operator and the public authority managing the space in order to use the land of any of the public authority for sustainable mobility purposes. • Include data clauses on the agreements and define protocols for data sharing • Agree on clear responsibilities of each public authority (maintenance, insurance, surveillance, cleaning, etc) • Stakeholders' engagement platforms should be harmonized, together with mobility competence centers for innovative mobility policy & solutions taken up. • An innovative procurement process needs to be applied for speeding up the contractual processes, avoiding delays in the implementation processes and enhancing the provision of innovative technological equipment • Need for full public involvement for SUMP/ SULP and Metropolitan Mobility Plan. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Need for better monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution • Ensure funding sources and subsidies for covering the costs for implementation and operation of innovative mobility solutions • Introduce regulations to facilitate the installation of mobility services promoted by public entities • Introduce campaigns and education activities for gaining the confidence of the users

Scenario 2

In the city's 2nd scenario, the stakeholders’ expectations show a clear trend toward the use of environmentally friendly transport modes and a preference to the public transportation by the citizens. More specifically, an increase of up to 10% in the share of public transportation, active transportation and shared mobility is foreseen. The strongly noted environmental consciousness of the city’s population is further justified by the expected slight decrease of up to 5% in the share of car transportation.

In terms of urban freight transportation, the responses show also a clear trend towards more green deliveries, with an increase of up to 30% to the share of green deliveries to be expected. On the other hand though, the same increase on the next hour next day deliveries is also expected.

Scenario 3

In the 3rd scenario, a clear trend towards the use of environmentally friendly transport modes and a preference to public transportation by the citizens is indicated. With respect to the passenger transport mix, an increase of up to 15% in the share of public transportation , and up to 10% in both the micro-mobility and car-sharing transport is foreseen and a decrease of up to 10% in car transportation respectively. On the other hand, a minor increase, up to 5% to the share of active transportation is foreseen.

In terms of urban freight transportation, a clear trend towards more green deliveries is observed, with an increase of up to 30% to the share of green deliveries to be expected. Regarding the share of next hour and next day goods delivery schemes, although the 75% of the participants agree that this figure will increase by 2025-2030, their opinion on the level of impact though varies. The balance among those perceptions can be placed approximately at 30-50% increase of this indicator.

Kalisz

Scenario 1

A change in the inhabitants’ behavior towards more sustainable modes is strongly justified by the analysis of the first consequence area. More specifically, an increase from 10 to 15% to the share of public transportation as well as micro mobility and active transportation is foreseen. On the other hand, although an increase of up to 5% in the share of car transport is also awaited, a preference to car sharing services is foreseen by the local stakeholders. This development might result eventually to a decrease of the car ownership rate, which at this point stands at approximately 64.8%

In terms of urban freight transportation, an increase from 10 to 30% in the share of green deliveries is foreseen while the provision of on demand and next hour deliveries is not expected to affect the city’s mobility state.

IoT-enabled urban logistics

• UC1: IoT-enabled urban logistics

IoT network and app for drivers’ time planning and booking

• During the implementation, the loading bays were used only for a limited time during delivery hours. For the remaining time (e.g. night hours) the place was not used and at the same time was unavailable to residents. • The average distance of manual goods handling from vehicle to a place of delivery was longer compared to “illegal parking” • The undisciplined drivers of trucks or cars occupying the bay • The lack of budget for parking fees led to the need to pay parking fees and billings

• PM1: Adapted regulations for smart bays, with private cars able to park on them during dedicated hours and/or days (like at weekends) • PM2: Environmental criteria in public delivery contracts (bike delivery, e-vehicles, etc.) • PM3: Provision of inner-city micro-consolidation centres • PM4: Weight and/or size restrictions for delivery vehicles

• Need for introduction of the change of truck-parking charging method toward subscription instead of fees • Need for enabling the reloading bays for temporary parking of private cars during night hours and at weekends • Need for better planning (e.g. find the technical solution, resistant to local climate conditions working properly in highly urbanized areas) • Need for use of two-directional communication with the sensors to react quick in case of their failure

• IR Score: 2.03 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 2.00 • Climate and City Typology: 2.42 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.68 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.18 • Inter-departmental coordination: 2.00 • Mobility Planning: 2.00 • Liaise: 2.00 • Public Investments: 2.00 • Openness: 3.00 • Science & Education: 2.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.50 • Data availability: 1.50 • Cities Capacity: 1.80 • Culture: 2.30 • Industry Diversity: 2.00

• Liveability Score: 1.78 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 4.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.33 • Safe & Secure: 2.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.50 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 4.00 • Accessibility: 2.00 • Affordability: 3.33 • Availability: 1.00 • Safety and Security: 2.00 • Efficiency: 2.50 • Convenience: 2.50 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Transition Starter

• Governance: 1.63 • Sustainability: 0.83 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.5 • Safety: 0.25 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.31 • Urban Space Allocation: 0.4

• Better planning for urban logistics in compliance with general mobility planning processes (also last-mile policies). Including the urban logistics issues to the SUMP process and/or implement a SULP. • Need for better monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution (liveability tool, action tracker). • Create a stakeholders' engagement platform for discussion and consensus buildign, with the participation of representatives from various groups (drivers, logistics operators, shop owners, etc) for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city. • An innovative procurement process needs to be applied and a dedicated department or authority will be responsible for coordinating. • Introduce regulations to facilitate the installation of mobility services promoted by public entities • Incease of awareness campaings for better dissemination of the measure implemented in order to inform the citizens and become them aware about the benefits.

Scenario 2

In terms of passenger transportation, no special changes are expected to the current transport service structure and mix. Α slight change in the inhabitants’ behavior towards more active transport modes or car sharing modes is only foreseen which won’t exceed 5%.

In terms of urban freight transportation, there is a slight increase in the share of green deliveries (less than 10%), while the city does not expect the introduction of next-hour / same-day delivery services.

Scenario 3

In the 3rd scenario, the strong growth of Kalisz’s citizens’ environmental consciousness and changing behavior towards car ownership, clearly changes the picture of the current share of transport modes for passenger transportation. Based on the outcomes of the survey, the city expects an increase of approximately 10 to 15% in the share of both public transportation, micro-mobility and active transportation. In terms of car transportation, a decrease in the correspondent share up to 10% is foreseen, while the share of car-sharing transportation is not expected to be affected.

In terms of urban freight transportation, an increase from 10 to 30% in the share of green deliveries is foreseen while the provision of on-demand and next-hour deliveries is not expected to affect the city’s mobility state.

Budapest

Scenario 1

In Budapest's 1st scenario, a strong change in the inhabitants’ behavior towards moreSustainability:modes is observed. The city foresees a moderate –from 5 to 10%- an increase of the share of public transport, a major increase -more than 15%- to the share of micro-mobility as well as active transportation. Regarding car transportation, a major increase in the share of car-sharing transport and a high decrease -from 10 to 15%- of the total share for car transport strongly justifies the green transformation of Budapest.

In terms of urban freight transportation, a major increase (more than 50%) in the share of green deliveries is expected and a moderate –from 10 to 30%- increase in the share of next-hour and same-day deliveries.

Shared passengers' mobility

• UC1: Planned traffic regulation changes • UC2: Creation of micromobility point

Public space reallocation- not cars in favour of active mobility and leisure activities

• High car traffic volume in the pilot area, there is not enough place for pedestrians, micromobility users. • Shared micromobility devices are denied at the pilot area, because there is currently no regulation for their storage. • Strong criticism that the project received at the very early stage from local resident and several decision-makers.

• PM1: Construction of protected and well-maintained bicycle lanes and main lines • PM2: Establishment of low-emission zones (emission- based recovery restrictions • PM3: Resolving legal issues related to the regulation of market-based services   • PM4: Tools used to strengthen the link between the public and private sectors

Need to: • set up benches, street furniture, bicycle racks, points on the place of closed parking slots, • issue permits to restaurants to build terraces before the traffic calming, so after the calming is introduced, the restaurants will be able to replace the vacated parking spaces with their terraces, • camera inspection of streets blocked from traffic to check entry permits.

• IR Score: 3.10 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.56 • Climate and City Typology: 3.85 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.50 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.09 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 3.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 5.00 • Science & Education: 3.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.00 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.50 • Culture: 2.30 • Industry Diversity: 4.00

• Liveability Score: 3.02 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 2.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.25 • Safe & Secure: 5.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.57 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.00 • Sustainability: 2.00 • Accessibility: 1.50 • Affordability: 2.00 • Availability: 3.00 • Safety and Security: 5.00 • Efficiency: 2.00 • Convenience: 2.80 • Behaviour and Smartness: 4.00

Sustainable

• Governance: 1.13 • Sustainability: 1.33 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.6 • Safety: 1.5 • Smart Infrastructure: 2.03 • Urban Space Allocation: 0.8

• The city needs to ensure smart public-private schemes and secure funding for the wide development of integrated ICT & ITS enabled solutions for mobility • 6-month meetings among industry and public administration for solutions’ definitions are suggested, together with citizens’ engagement platforms and freight partnerships in operation with the city • Need for full public involvement for SUMP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Need for the introduction of new measures for car traffic regulations, micromobility devices’ storage, priority to PT and low-emission zones • Monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution • Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome the strong criticism against the implementation of innovative mobility solutions and for enhancing the stakeholders’ acceptance

Scenario 2

In the 2nd scenario, the limited rise in environmental consciousness is clearly presented, with the city foreseeing a slight increase in the share of car transportation and no further changes in the transport structure and mix. The share of environmentally friendly transport modes i.e. micro-mobility, active transportation, car sharing and public transportation will remain stable.

In terms of urban freight transportation, similarly no significant changes towards the implementation of green deliveries is expected. However, the future shows a transformed e-commerce sector which will provide by 30 to 50% more next-hour/ same-day deliveries.

Scenario 3

In the 3rd scenario, a strong change in the inhabitants’ behavior towards moreSustainability:modes is observed. The city foresees a moderate –from 5 to 10%- increase in the share of public transport as well active transportation and a high increase - from 10 to 15%- in the share of micro-mobility. Regarding car transportation, a high increase in the share of car-sharing transport and a slight decrease –up to 5%- of the total share for car transport strongly justifies the green transformation of Budapest.

In terms of urban freight transportation, an increase, from 10 to 30% in the share of green deliveries is foreseen and a high –from 30 to 50%- increase in the share of next-hour and same-day deliveries.

Tel Aviv

Scenario 1

In Tel Aviv's 1st scenario, a change in the inhabitants’ behavior toward more sustainable modes is clearly observed. More specifically, an increase from 10 to 15% in the share of public transportation and active transportation as well as a decrease from 10 to 15% in the share of car transportation is foreseen. Especially, regarding the use of new mobility services by the city’s inhabitants, an increase of more than 15% in the share of micro-mobility is foreseen.

In terms of urban freight transportation, an increase from 10 to 30% in the share of green deliveries as well as in the share of next-hour/same-day deliveries is foreseen.

Data-driven urban mobility planning and traffic management strategies to prioritized non-motorized transport modes and vulnerable road users

• UC1: Passengers' mobility patterns' identification • UC2: Public sphere re-allocation • UC3: Vulnerable road users prioritization use case

Passengers mobility patterns identification (BT detectors, trajectory clustering, visualization techniques)

• Partial data availability, meaning the insufficient deployment of BT detectors (raw data) and GIS data needed for calculations (such as travel time threshold values) • Considerable efforts required to ensure data privacy regulations and the data validation processes required to ensure the quality of the data used for analysis

• PM1: Support cooperation with data providers from the private sector to enhance data quality by supporting data fusion from multiple resources • PM2: Provide clear measures for traffic data quality based on the application (traffic management , planning, etc.) • PM3: Set agreements for data • PM4: Define the data collection devices’ maintenance policy (for example quick repair of identified damaged devices and periodic inspections)

Need to: • Study the appropriate business model for data acquirement. Data collection equipment, frequency of data collection, data accuracy, and technology maturity are part of the criteria's that should be considered. GIS data layer of the network is essential, including all traffic arrangements. • Integrate the local knowledge of traffic experts throughout the process. Advanced data analysis capabilities, and acquaintance with big data analysis techniques are mandatory. • Determine the characteristics of the decision supporting tool, and address challenges related to visualisation of geospatial data, and BI systems.

• IR Score: 3.11 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.12 • Climate and City Typology: 3.58 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.59 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.09 • Inter-departmental coordination: 3.00 • Mobility Planning: 2.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 3.00 • Science & Education: 4.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.50 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.70 • Culture: 3.30 • Industry Diversity: 5.00

• Liveability Score: 2.82 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 2.50 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.44 • Safe & Secure: 4.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.83 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.00 • Sustainability: 2.50 • Accessibility: 3.67 • Affordability: 3.67 • Availability: 3.00 • Safety and Security: 4.00 • Efficiency: 3.50 • Convenience: 4.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.00

Mobility Pioneer

• Governance: 1.63 • Sustainability: 1.33 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.9 • Safety: 1 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.39 • Urban Space Allocation: 1

• Include a skilled workforce (quick team) that has the know-how in the procedures. Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome legal obstacles and fragmented market initiatives that create problems and for scaling up the innovative mobility solution in the city • Individual citizens' engagement platforms should be haromonized, together with mobility competence centers for innovative mobility policy & solutions taken up. •Facilitation of the data provision processes among stakeholders: special agreements for data provision. Increase data transparency and accountability based on the legal framework for ensuring data privacy (GDPR). • Monitoring of SUMP/SULP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution (liveability tool, action tracker). • On-going maintenance of technological equipment for ensuring the uninterapted implementation of each measure.

Scenario 2

In the city's 2nd scenario, the limited rise in environmental consciousness is clearly presented, with the city foreseeing a slight increase –from 5 to 10%- in the share of public transportation, a slight decrease in the share of micro-mobility and no further changes in the transport structure and mix. The transition towards micro-mobility won’t be supported and the number of shared dock-less bikes and e-scooters that are available by the city will remain as they are.

In terms of urban freight transportation, similarly, no significant changes toward the implementation of green deliveries are expected with the share of green deliveries to be decreased by 10%.

Scenario 3

In the city's 3rd scenario, a change in the inhabitants’ behavior towards moreSustainability:modes is justified by the expected increase from 10 to 15% in the share of public transportation and the slight decrease (up to 5%) in the share of car transportation. With regards to the use of new mobility services by the city’s inhabitants, the survey shows quite positive outcomes, with an increase from 5 to 10% in the share of micro-mobility to be foreseen. On the other hand, no significant changes in the share of active transportation are foreseen.

In terms of urban freight transportation, an increase of up to 10% in the share of green deliveries as well as in the share of next-hour/same-day deliveries is foreseen.

2nd layer cities

Gothenburg

Self-driving pods for cargo-hitching * Padua

• UC1: Self-driving pods for cargo hitching

Self-driving pods

• IR Score: 3.84 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.72 • Climate and City Typology: 5.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 4.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.24 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.28 • Inter-departmental coordination: 1.00 • Mobility Planning: 4.00 • Liaise: 5.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 5.00 • Science & Education: 5.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 4.00 • Data availability: 3.50 • Cities Capacity: 3.00 • Culture: 3.70 • Industry Diversity: 5.00

• Liveability Score: 2.96 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 3.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.14 • Safe & Secure: 3.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.17 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 3.00 • Accessibility: 2.00 • Affordability: 4.67 • Availability: 2.00 • Safety and Security: 3.50 • Efficiency: 4.00 • Convenience: 3.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Mobility Pioneer

• Governance: 1.88 • Sustainability: 2.67 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.5 • Safety: 0 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.86 • Urban Space Allocation: 2.2

• The city should have a team of experts and access to specialized organizations and tools for guiding decision-making on mobility solutions to be adopted, assessing the solutions' impact and developing dedicated policies to strengthen innovation. • A dedicated department or authority (quick team) should be responsible for coordinating the actors in the speedy adoption and assessment of innovative solutions. The public administration personnel involved in mobility managing should have also knowledge about urban logistics issues. • Need for full public and private involvement for SUMP and SULP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Citizens' engagement platforms should be created, together with 6-month meetings among industry partners and public administration for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city. *The city's political policy documents must form the basis and create the prerequsites for how the SUMP should be carried out. This includes all the adopted documents and strategies on both the top political level and even the city administration level. These documents should incorporate all the plans and strategies of the cities. *Other policies that should be taken into consideration, for example the city's declataration of intent towards the EC (100 climate-neutral cities mission).*As a port city, Gothenburg (largest port in Scandinavia) also has a national interest which means we have the national governments policy documents to consider *Port cities and cities with large industry and production facilities (eg vehicle production plants: in Gothenburg Volvo) are linked also to regional plans, (eg. freight distribution which passed not not only through the city yet the regional areas) as they are very important for the Swedish business industry.

Mechelen

• IR Score: 3.60 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 4.01 • Climate and City Typology: 3.85 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.20 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.72 • Inter-departmental coordination: 3.00 • Mobility Planning: 4.00 • Liaise: 5.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 5.00 • Science & Education: 3.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.50 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 3.80 • Culture: 4.30 • Industry Diversity: 3.00

• Liveability Score: 3.09 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 3.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.11 • Safe & Secure: 3.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 3.00 • Accessibility: 4.00 • Affordability: 3.00 • Availability: 2.33 • Safety and Security: 3.00 • Efficiency: 3.00 • Convenience: 3.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Mobility Pioneer

• Governance: 1.5 • Sustainability: 1.5 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 0.33 • Safety: 0 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.58 • Urban Space Allocation: 2.4

• The city should have a team of experts and access to specialized organizations and tools for guiding decision-making on mobility solutions to be adopted, assessing the solutions' impact and developing dedicated policies to strengthen innovation. • A dedicated department or authority (quick team) should be responsible for coordinating the actors in the speedy adoption and assessment of innovative solutions. The public administration personnel involved in mobility managing should have also knowledge about urbna logistics issues. • Need for full public involvement for SUMP and SULP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Citizens' engagement platforms should be created, together with 6-month meetings among industry partners and public administration for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city.- Implementing an AV on your local roads, the city is dependant on European and national legislation. There’s little a city can change about this. Ideally there’s a contact point on a national level to reach out to when the city has valuable arguments to change aspects of the legislation. • Next to external parties that need to be convinced about the added value of an AV, also internal parties might be sceptical. There’s a need of buy in of all involved departments of the city council that have a role in setting up an AV service: urban planning, spatial planning,… If they’re not convinced, it’s hard to get things moving. • When implementing an AV service, it’s important to have someone in the team who’s up to date about the technological readiness of the vehicles (what’s already possible, what’s not?). Not every city has a person like that in the team, so possibly an external party might be very valuable. • As a city it’s always important to keep the focus on the reason of implementing an AV service. The reason shouldn’t be innovating for the sake of innovation. It’s important to keep in mind: for which problem is the AV service a solution? Why are we doing this?

Hertogenbosch

Data-driven urban mobility planning and traffic management strategies to prioritized non-motorized transport modes and vulnerable road users * Budapest

• UC2: Creation of micromobility point

Creation of micro-mobility points

• IR Score: 3.52 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 4.03 • Climate and City Typology: 3.29 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.68 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.18 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 5.00 • Liaise: 5.00 • Public Investments: 3.00 • Openness: 3.00 • Science & Education: 3.50 • Transparency & Accountability: 3.00 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.80 • Culture: 4.30 • Industry Diversity: 4.00

• Liveability Score: 2.25 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 3.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.17 • Safe & Secure: 1.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.00 • Sustainability: 3.00 • Accessibility: 5.00 • Affordability: 2.67 • Availability: 3.00 • Safety and Security: 1.50 • Efficiency: 2.50 • Convenience: 3.50 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.00

Innovation Ready

• Governance: 1.38 • Sustainability: 1.67 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.1 • Safety: 1.5 • Smart Infrastructure: 2.03 • Urban Space Allocation: 2.6

* The city needs to ensure smart public-private schemes and secure funding for the wide development of integrated ICT & ITS enabled solutions for mobility * Need for full public involvement for SUMP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. * Monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution * Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome the strong criticism against the implementation of innovative mobility solutions and for enhancing the stakeholders’ acceptance * Include data clauses on the agreements and define protocols for data sharing * Agree on clear responsibilities of each public authority (maintenance, insurance, surveillance, cleaning, etc) * Stakeholders' engagement platforms should be harmonized, together with mobility competence centers for innovative mobility policy & solutions taken up. * Ensure funding sources and subsidies for covering the costs for implementation and operation of innovative mobility solutions, in collaboration with the stakeholders. * Need for full public involvement for SUMP/ SULP and Metropolitan Mobility Plan. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan.

Transport for West Midlands

Data-driven urban mobility planning and traffic management strategies to prioritized non-motorized transport modes and vulnerable road users * Budapest

• UC2: Creation of micromobility point

Creation of micro-mobility points

• IR Score: 3.41 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 4.29 • Climate and City Typology: 3.71 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.50 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.00 • Inter-departmental coordination: 5.00 • Mobility Planning: 5.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 3.50 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.50 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.50 • Culture: 3.00 • Industry Diversity: 3.00

• Liveability Score: 0.66 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: Ν/Α • Smart & Easily accessible: 1.83 • Safe & Secure: Ν/Α • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 5.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.00 • Sustainability: Ν/Α • Accessibility: 2.00 • Affordability: 2.33 • Availability: 1.00 • Safety and Security: Ν/Α • Efficiency: Ν/Α • Convenience: 5.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 2.00

Innovation Ready

• Governance: 0.63 • Sustainability: 0.33 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1 • Safety: 0.75 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.47 • Urban Space Allocation: 0.4

• The city needs to ensure smart public-private schemes and secure funding for the wide development of integrated ICT & ITS enabled solutions for mobility • Arrangement of regular forums among industry and public administration for solutions’ definitions are suggested, together with citizens’ engagement platforms and freight partnerships in operation with the city • Need for full public involvement for SUMP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Need for the introduction of new measures for car traffic regulations, micromobility devices’ storage, priority to PT and low-emission zones • Monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution • Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome the strong criticism against the implementation of innovative mobility solutions and for enhancing the stakeholders’ acceptance

Région Île-de-France

IoT-enabled urban logistics * Kalisz

• UC1: IoT-enabled urban logistics

IoT-enabled urban logistics

• IR Score: 3.19 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.14 • Climate and City Typology: 4.71 • Smart & Easily accessible: 1.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.76 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 4.09 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 3.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 3.00 • Openness: 5.00 • Science & Education: 4.50 • Transparency & Accountability: 1.50 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 3.00 • Culture: 3.30 • Industry Diversity: 5.50

• Liveability Score: 1.91 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 2.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.43 • Safe & Secure: 4.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: Ν/Α • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 2.00 • Accessibility: 1.50 • Affordability: 2.67 • Availability: 3.00 • Safety and Security: 4.00 • Efficiency: Ν/Α • Convenience: Ν/Α • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Innovation Ready

• Governance: 1.75 • Sustainability: 2.44 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 2.38 • Safety: 2 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.97 • Urban Space Allocation: 2.2

• Need for full public involvement for SUMP and SULP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Create a stakeholders' engagement platform for discussion and consensus buildign, with the participation of representatives from various groups (drivers, logistics operators, shop owners, etc) for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city. • Need for better monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution (liveability tool, action tracker). • An innovative procurement process needs to be applied and a dedicated department or authority will be responsible for coordinating. • Introduce regulations to facilitate the installation of mobility services promoted by public entities • Incease of awareness campaings for better dissemination of the measure implemented in order to inform the citizens and become them aware about the benefits. • On-going maintenance of technological equipment for ensuring the uninterapted implementation of each measure. • Agree on clear responsibilities of each public authority (maintenance, insurance, surveillance, cleaning, etc) • Include data clauses on the agreements and define protocols for data sharing •Facilitation of the data provision processes among stakeholders: special agreements for data provision. Increase data transparency and accountability based on the legal framework for ensuring data privacy (GDPR).

Minneapolis

• IR Score: 3.12 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.44 • Climate and City Typology: 4.29 • Smart & Easily accessible: 4.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.09 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.28 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 4.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 3.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 4.50 • Transparency & Accountability: 4.50 • Data availability: 2.00 • Cities Capacity: 2.20 • Culture: 1.70 • Industry Diversity: 3.00

• Liveability Score: 1.35 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: Ν/Α • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.75 • Safe & Secure: 2.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.50 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.00 • Sustainability: Ν/Α • Accessibility: 2.67 • Affordability: 4.00 • Availability: 1.00 • Safety and Security: 2.00 • Efficiency: 2.00 • Convenience: 1.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 2.00

Innovation Ready

• Governance: 0.88 • Sustainability: 0 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.25 • Safety: 0.25 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.39 • Urban Space Allocation: 1.2

• The city should have a team of experts and access to specialized organizations and tools for guiding decision-making on mobility solutions to be adopted, assessing the solutions' impact and developing dedicated policies to strengthen innovation. • A dedicated department or authority (quick team) should be responsible for coordinating the actors in the speedy adoption and assessment of innovative solutions. The public administration personnel involved in mobility managing should have also knowledge about urbna logistics issues. • Need for full public involvement for SUMP and SULP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Speed up the contractual process between the logistics operator and the public authority managing the space in order to use the land of any of the public authority for sustainable mobility purposes. • Include data clauses on the agreements and define protocols for data sharing • Stakeholders' engagement platforms should be harmonized, together with mobility competence centers for innovative mobility policy & solutions taken up. • Introduce campaigns and education activities for gaining the confidence of the users

Ioannina

Data-driven urban mobility planning and traffic management strategies to prioritized non-motorized transport modes and vulnerable road users * Budapest

• UC1: Planned traffic regulation changes

Realocating public space for reducing car dependency: creation of pedestrian and cycling zones

• IR Score: 2.97 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 3.85 • Climate and City Typology: 4.13 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.82 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.00 • Inter-departmental coordination: 4.00 • Mobility Planning: 4.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 5.00 • Science & Education: 3.50 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.50 • Data availability: 2.00 • Cities Capacity: 1.70 • Culture: 2..00 • Industry Diversity: 2.00

• Liveability Score: 1.21 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 2.00 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.00 • Safe & Secure: 1.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 3.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.00 • Sustainability: 2.00 • Accessibility: 5.00 • Affordability: 2.33 • Availability: Ν/Α • Safety and Security: 1.00 • Efficiency: Ν/Α • Convenience: 3.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.00

Transition Starter

• Governance: 0.63 • Sustainability: 0 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 0.7 • Safety: 0.25 • Smart Infrastructure: 0.33 • Urban Space Allocation: 0.2

• The city needs to ensure smart public-private schemes and secure funding for the wide development of integrated ICT & ITS enabled solutions for mobility • 6-month meetings among industry and public administration for solutions’ definitions are suggested, together with citizens’ engagement platforms and freight partnerships in operation with the city • Providing incentives to start-ups and high-tech companies that are present or soon-to-be establised in the city • Need for full public involvement for SUMP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan • Need for the introduction of new measures for car traffic regulations, micromobility devices’ storage, priority to PT and low-emission zones • Continued infrastructure development in order to provide inclusivity for innovative mobility solutions • Monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution • Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome the strong criticism against the implementation of innovative mobility solutions and for enhancing the stakeholders’ acceptance

Almada

IoT-enabled urban logistics * Kalisz

• UC1: IoT-enabled urban logistics

IoT-enabled urban logistics

• IR Score: 2.76 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 2.69 • Climate and City Typology: 3.42 • Smart & Easily accessible: 4.50 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.41 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 1.91 • Inter-departmental coordination: 2.00 • Mobility Planning: 1.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 4.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 3.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 4.50 • Data availability: 2.50 • Cities Capacity: 2.30 • Culture: 2.70 • Industry Diversity: 1.00

• Liveability Score: 3.10 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: 3.50 • Smart & Easily accessible: 3.60 • Safe & Secure: 5.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.67 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: 3.50 • Accessibility: 4.00 • Affordability: 3.33 • Availability: Ν/Α • Safety and Security: 5.00 • Efficiency: 1.00 • Convenience: 3.00 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Sustainable

• Governance: 0.38 • Sustainability: 0.67 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 1.4 • Safety: 0 • Smart Infrastructure: 0 • Urban Space Allocation: 1

• Better planning for urban logistics in compliance with general mobility planning processes (also last-mile policies). Including the urban logistics issues to the SUMP process and/or implement a SULP - Almada agrees with this measure, however, taking into account that Almada's Mobility Plan is very old and needs to be updated, it does not include logistics issues. However, we have a metropolitan level SUMP, in which Almada is included, that already includes specific guidelines for urban logistics, which meet this recommendation. • Need for better monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution (liveability tool, action tracker) - Essential. • Create a stakeholders' engagement platform for discussion and consensus buildign, with the participation of representatives from various groups (drivers, logistics operators, shop owners, etc) for solutions definitions and measures assessment. Freight partnerships should be available and in operation with the city - Almada agrees with this recommendation, in fact we already have a group of local stakeholders with whom we dialogue about mobility issues, however, at the metropolitan level this group has a larger dimension and scope, allowing us to work on local/metropolitan logistics issues in a more efficient and sustainable way. • An innovative procurement process needs to be applied and a dedicated department or authority will be responsible for coordinating - In Almada, at local level, these issues are coordinated by the municipality within its structure and at the metropolitan level by a specific entity that coordinates and articulates these issues among the several municipalities of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (AML). • Introduce regulations to facilitate the installation of mobility services promoted by public entities - In Portugal, as far as urban logistics services are concerned, there is still no legislation that promotes it's implementation by public entities. However, in terms of urban consolidation centers, we are already beginning to consider and study solutions for the participation of these entities. • Incease of awareness campaings for better dissemination of the measure implemented in order to inform the citizens and become them aware about the benefits - This recommendation is valid and transversal for all the interventions and measures that the municipality intends to develop, so it is already a standard practice and should be considered in any development plan.

Arad

Data-driven urban mobility planning and traffic management strategies to prioritized non-motorized transport modes and vulnerable road users * Budapest

• UC1: Planned traffic regulation changes

Realocating public space for reducing car dependency: creation of pedestrian and cycling zones

• IR Score: 2.35 • Innovative Governance & Growth: 2.86 • Climate and City Typology: 2.85 • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 1.68 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 2.00 • Inter-departmental coordination: 2.00 • Mobility Planning: 3.00 • Liaise: 3.00 • Public Investments: 3.00 • Openness: 4.00 • Science & Education: 2.00 • Transparency & Accountability: 2.00 • Data availability: 1.50 • Cities Capacity: 1.80 • Culture: 2.00 • Industry Diversity: 2.00

• Liveability Score: 2.50 • Innovative Governance & Growth: - • Climate and City Typology: Ν/Α • Smart & Easily accessible: 2.50 • Safe & Secure: 5.00 • Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra availble: 2.00 • Innovative People & Stakeholders: 3.50 • Sustainability: Ν/Α • Accessibility: 2.00 • Affordability: 2.00 • Availability: 3.33 • Safety and Security: 5.00 • Efficiency: 1.00 • Convenience: 2.40 • Behaviour and Smartness: 3.50

Sustainable

• Governance: 2 • Sustainability: 1.73 • Affordability, Availability, Accessibility: 0.8 • Safety: 2 • Smart Infrastructure: 1.06 • Urban Space Allocation: 1.2

• The city needs to ensure smart public-private schemes and secure funding for the wide development of integrated ICT & ITS enabled solutions for mobility • 6-month meetings among industry and public administration for solutions’ definitions are suggested, together with citizens’ engagement platforms and freight partnerships in operation with the city • Need for full public involvement for SUMP. The policy instruments should be linked with available finance and political support, while the innovative solutions implemented should be a part of the applied plan. • Need for the introduction of new measures for car traffic regulations, micromobility devices’ storage, priority to PT and low-emission zones • Monitoring of SUMP implementation impact and the innovative mobility solution • Provision of knowledge and tools in order to help overcome the strong criticism against the implementation of innovative mobility solutions and for enhancing the stakeholders’ acceptance